Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 475-500 |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Right-facing bust of Emperor Leo I, pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed, rendered in the late antique imperial tradition. The effigy is encircled by a beaded border and accompanied by a continuous Latin legend in the field. The workmanship reflects a barbarian imitative style, with somewhat schematic facial features and simplified drapery typical of Germanic workshop production of the late fifth century. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Latin |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
After the deposition of Romulus Augustulus in 476, various Germanic successor powers continued striking tremisses in the names of legitimate Eastern emperors — a deliberate act of fiscal conservatism, since coins bearing recognized imperial names circulated without friction across former Roman territories. Invoking Leo I, who had died in 474, placed these issues in a narrow window of retrospective legitimacy.
Attribution remains contested. The Arles reference points toward a southern Gallic mint, possibly under Visigothic control during their peak territorial expansion into Provence.