Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 475-500 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Solidus (circa 301-750) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | COMOB (Translation: Constantinople) |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
After the deposition of Romulus Augustulus in 476, various Germanic successor powers continued striking tremisses in the names of legitimate Eastern emperors — a deliberate act of fiscal conservatism, since coins bearing recognized imperial names circulated without friction across former Roman territories. Invoking Leo I, who had died in 474, placed these issues in a narrow window of retrospective legitimacy.
Attribution remains contested. The Arles reference points toward a southern Gallic mint, possibly under Visigothic control during their peak territorial expansion into Provence.