Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Tibet |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1860 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Central device consists of a prominent double-thunderbolt (vishvavajra) or stylized lotus symbol in high relief at the heart of the coin, rendered with bold, flowing strokes. Surrounding the central medallion are six circular cartouches arranged symmetrically, each enclosing a distinct auspicious Tibetan symbol: including floral rosettes, a trefoil, a conch-like device, and a grid or lattice motif. Small pellets are scattered between the cartouches, providing decorative infill. The entire composition is framed by a continuous border of raised beads. The overall design reflects the traditional Tibetan iconographic vocabulary associated with the Eight Auspicious Symbols (Ashtamangala). |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Kongpo Mint, Tibet |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Kong-par Tangka takes its name from the Kongpo region where it was initially produced, though by the mid-nineteenth century output had shifted between several Tibetan mints operating under inconsistent supervision. Type 3 represents a die evolution within the series, distinguished by specialists primarily through pellet counts and border arrangements — details that accumulated organically as engravers replaced worn dies without strict adherence to a master template. Tibet had no centralized mint authority in the Western sense, and the resulting die-to-die variation across types is substantial enough that attribution sometimes depends on a single pellet.