See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Tahil

Issuer Pre-Islamic kingdoms
Year 800-1300
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation None
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering
Reverse description Incuse field bearing a bold Nāgarī character struck into the convex gold surface, rendered in a stylised archaic script consistent with early medieval South and Southeast Asian epigraphic traditions. The legend, reading 'त' (ta), occupies the central field and is deeply impressed, its strokes bold and angular against the lustrous hammered gold ground. The flan is irregular and globular in form, with the device occupying the majority of the usable die area. No border or additional decorative elements are present, reflecting the austere aesthetic of pre-Islamic coinage of the region.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

These diminutive gold pieces circulated across the maritime trading networks of insular Southeast Asia during a period when Hindu-Buddhist polities controlled the spice and forest-product routes connecting China to the Indian Ocean world. The tahil was a weight unit before it was a denomination, and the fractional gold pieces struck to that standard served commerce more than they served any single state — which is why attribution to a specific issuer remains contested across the references.

Wicks's classification separates these by fabric and find-site distribution rather than by political authority, a telling admission about how little we know of the minting arrangements behind them.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE