Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
1 Solidus - Witigis / In the name of Justinian I, 527-565 Star to the left
| Issuer | Ostrogothic Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Year | 536-539 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | D N IVSTINI - LNVS PF AVC (Translation: Dominus Noster Justinianus Perpetuus Felix Augustus — Our Lord Justinian, Perpetual Felix Augustus) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Witigis seized the Ostrogothic throne in 536 by deposing Theodahad — a king so unpopular that his own men killed him on the road. The timing was catastrophic: Justinian's general Belisarius had already landed in Italy, and the Byzantine reconquest was underway. These solidi, struck in Witigis's name but bearing Justinian's imperial title, reflect the political fiction Ostrogothic kings maintained throughout their Italian tenure — coining in gold required the emperor's nominal sanction, a convention the Goths never broke even as they fought Byzantium directly.
The star left of the bust is the distinguishing mark separating this emission from closely related issues, and Metlich's placement of this type on page 29 without a discrete catalogue number reflects how contested the attribution sequence remains.