Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Shilling without Colony of Fiji undertext

Uitgever Government of Fiji
Jaar 1942
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Rectangular
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde The Fijian Coat of Arms, supported by two figures, is centrally positioned at the top of the note above the issuer inscription and denomination rendered in bold letterpress. A rectangular border with notched corners frames the entire design, with the denomination '1s.' repeated in each corner. Three manuscript signatures of the Commissioners of Currency appear at the lower centre, below the legal tender clause dated 1st January, 1942.
Opschrift voorzijde GOVERNMENT OF FIJI These Notes are Legal Tender for payment of an amount not exceeding Forty Shillings ONE SHILLING For the Government of Fiji: 1st January, 1942. Commissioners of Currency.
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

In early 1942, with Japanese forces advancing through the Pacific, Fiji's government issued emergency fractional currency to address a severe coin shortage — base metals had been redirected to the war effort. The 1 Shilling notes were produced in two distinct varieties: one carrying the undertext "Colony of Fiji" and this one, without it. The reason for the omission remains undocumented in official records, likely a press correction mid-run rather than a deliberate policy change.

The without-undertext variety is considerably scarcer than its counterpart, and the distinction is easy to overlook at a glance.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT