Catalog
| Issuer | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 240 BC - 225 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Semis = 1/2 As |
| Currency | As (circa 301-201 BC) |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 74.51 g |
| Diameter | 51 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | ICC#148 var., HN Italy#65d, Catalli#78d, Haeberlin#p.266, SNG Firenze 2#1044 |
| Obverse description | Six-spoked wheel. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Anchor surrounded by six dots. |
| Reverse script | |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | Smooth. |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (240 BC - 225 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1008752510 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This substantial 1 Semis bronze, issued by an uncertain Etruscan mint between 240 BC and 225 BC, belongs to a critical period in Etruscan history. Following the First Punic War, Etruria found itself increasingly under the Roman sphere of influence, a process that would culminate in its full integration into the Roman Republic. The issuance of such heavy bronze coinage (74.51 grams, 51 mm) reflects a vibrant, albeit localized, economic system, often preceding or running concurrently with early Roman Aes Grave. These issues highlight the independent monetary policies of Etruscan city-states as they navigated a changing geopolitical landscape, demonstrating their continued economic agency even as Roman power grew. The denomination itself, a Semis, indicates an awareness of the duodecimal system common in central Italy.
Artistry: The design of this Semis is characterized by its robust and functional iconography, typical of large-format Italic bronze coinage. The obverse features a prominent wheel with six spokes, a symbol frequently associated with transportation, commerce, or perhaps even a solar or cosmic significance. The reverse displays a clear anchor, a universally recognized emblem of maritime trade, stability, and port activity. While no specific engraver is known for these anonymous issues, the style reflects the late Classical to early Hellenistic influences prevalent in Etruscan art, adapted to the practical demands of heavy bronze casting and striking. The choice of these particular motifs strongly suggests a mint located in a significant trading hub, possibly coastal or riverine, emphasizing the region's economic reliance on transport and seafaring.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a substantial bronze flan measuring 51 mm and weighing 74.51 grams, this coin represents a significant metallurgical achievement for its era. For grading, key high-points to examine include the clarity and completeness of the six spokes on the wheel, ensuring the rim is well-defined. On the reverse, the definition of the anchor's stock, shank, and flukes is paramount. Due to the inherent challenges of striking such large and heavy bronzes, minor areas of weakness or off-centering are common. The surface quality, including the presence and consistency of the patina, absence of significant pitting, or corrosive damage, is also crucial for assessing its overall preservation and technical strike quality. Sharpness in the central devices indicates a strong strike.