Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain city of Central Italy |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 301 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | 151.60 g |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | A krater rendered in relief occupies the central field, depicted in profile with a rounded body and flaring mouth, consistent with the aes grave casting tradition of Central Italy. The design is bold and schematic, characteristic of early Roman and Italic monetary iconography. The surface shows typical casting texture with slight irregularities at the flan edges. No legend or inscription is present. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Aes grave — literally "heavy bronze" — was cast rather than struck, a production method that sets these pieces apart from virtually every other coinage tradition in the ancient Mediterranean. This semis belongs to the contested output of central Italian mints whose precise civic attribution remains unresolved; the references align it broadly with the series catalogued by Haeberlin, whose 1910 monograph on aes grave remains the foundational study despite a century of subsequent scholarship failing to fully resolve the attribution problem.
At this weight, the piece reflects the pre-reform libral or near-libral standard before Roman monetary reorganization progressively reduced cast bronze weights through the Second Punic War period.