Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Einbeck, City of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1620-1621 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Thaler |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | FERDINANDVS II ROM IMP |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Kipper und Wipper crisis of 1619–1623 was one of the worst currency debasements in pre-modern European history, driven by dozens of German states and municipalities racing to mint debased coinage, collect good metal in exchange, and profit from the spread before the system collapsed. Einbeck was among the smaller municipal participants. The Schreckenberger denomination — already archaic by 1620 — was revived specifically for Kipper-period issues, lending a veneer of traditional legitimacy to what was essentially exploitative emergency coinage.
Buck Ei#65d identifies this as a specific die variant within Einbeck's narrow two-year window of production.