Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Hamburg, Free Hanseatic city of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1669-1670 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Hammered |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | The reverse presents the denomination inscription arranged in three lines within a beaded inner circle: I / SCHIL / LING, flanked by pellets above and below. A six-petaled rosette ornament appears at the top of the inner circle. The surrounding outer legend reads STADT · GILDT · 1669, with the date integrated into the circular field, referencing the civic monetary authority of Hamburg. The overall layout is simple and functional, consistent with small-denomination Hanseatic Schilling coinage of the late seventeenth century. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Hamburg's schilling coinage of this period was issued under the city's jealously guarded monetary autonomy — the Senate repeatedly resisted incorporation into the broader Imperial coinage system, preferring to maintain denominational structures tied to local trade rather than Reichstaler conventions. The 1669–1670 date range suggests a two-year emission, likely tied to a specific civic minting contract rather than a continuous series.
Gaedechens 971 is a scarce attribution in finer grades; most survivors show heavy circulation wear consistent with small change in an active mercantile port.