Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Bengal Presidency |
|---|---|
| Year | 1759-1760 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | The field displays a three-line Persian legend in Nastaliq script reading 'Sikka Badshah Ghazi Shah Jahan', arranged horizontally across the coin and separated by a raised linear border. The inscription, invoking the Mughal imperial title, occupies the full field with bold, deeply struck calligraphic characters. Small decorative pellet or annulet devices are visible in the upper portion of the field. The coin bears no mint date on this face, consistent with the undated (ND) classification. The overall style follows the standard Mughal hammered rupee fabric of the mid-eighteenth century. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Arabic |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Bengal Presidency rupee of this period occupies a peculiar moment in British-Indian monetary history: the East India Company was still striking coins in the name of the Mughal emperor Alamgir II, maintaining the fiction of Mughal authority even as Company power consolidated rapidly following Clive's victory at Plassey in 1757. The Murshidabad mint, which produced this type, had effectively passed into Company control by this point, though the coins gave no indication of it.
The KM#475.4 attribution reflects a specific regnal year and mint mark combination that distinguishes it within a dense web of closely related varieties — misidentification between these Presidency rupees remains routine even among specialist dealers.