See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

1 Pound

Issuer Bahamas Government
Year 1869
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Pound
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Black letterpress print on a light-blue guilloche underprint, with red serial numbers applied separately. A light-blue official seal is positioned at the upper left, alongside the central text block carrying the full legal and treasury authority inscriptions. The note bears a formal, document-style layout consistent with mid-nineteenth-century colonial treasury issues.
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse is essentially unprinted, presenting a plain aged paper surface with no engraved or typeset design elements, typical of early colonial treasury notes of this period where the reverse was left blank as issued.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

The Bahamas Government was among the earliest British colonial administrations to issue its own paper currency rather than relying entirely on imported British notes or local private bank issues. This 1869 pound predates the more familiar Bahamas Government series of the twentieth century by decades and belongs to a period when colonial treasury notes were genuinely uncommon instruments — printed in small quantities, circulated among a small population, and rarely surviving intact.

Major & Knapp were a New York lithographic firm better known for commercial work than currency printing, which places this issue outside the usual lineage of security printers like Perkins Bacon or De La Rue. Whether that choice reflected cost, logistics, or colonial indifference to security features is not recorded.