Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Pfennig - George III

Uitgever Brunswick-Lüneburg-Calenberg-Hannover
Jaar 1780-1802
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Copper
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Latin
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde The reverse displays the denomination and designation in five horizontal lines of bold raised Latin lettering filling the central field: I / PFENN: / SCHEIDE / MÜNTZ / followed by the four-digit date. The inscription denotes the coin's status as Scheidemünze (small change currency). The field is otherwise plain, with no border legend or decorative elements, imparting a stark, utilitarian character typical of late eighteenth-century German copper coinage.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Brunswick-Lüneburg-Calenberg-Hannover was one of the more administratively tangled of the German states, and George III ruled it as Elector — never setting foot there once during his reign. The Hanoverian coinage of this period was managed entirely through local ministers, producing issues that circulated in a territory the titular ruler knew only through correspondence. The Calenberg line's copper pfennig was struck across more than two decades with little variation, which partly explains the wide date range and the difficulty in attributing individual pieces precisely within it.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT