Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Pfennig - Otto II
| Uitgever | Bavaria, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1231-1253 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Silver |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Armored rider on horseback proceeding to the right, raising an upright sword in the right hand. The horse is depicted in a stylized, flat relief characteristic of 13th-century Bavarian bracteate-influenced pfennig coinage. The figure occupies the majority of the field, with the irregular flan edge visible around the periphery. No legend is present. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Otto II of Bavaria — "the Illustrious" — ruled during a period of aggressive territorial consolidation, and his coinage reflects the fragmented monetary reality of 13th-century German duchies, where local bracteate and thin-flan issues circulated alongside imperial coinage with no reliable standardization. The Wittelsbach mint output under Otto II is catalogued but imperfectly understood; Wittich and Emmerig disagree on attribution details for several types within this sequence.
The 22-year span assigned to this issue acknowledges genuine scholarly uncertainty about when specific dies entered and left production.