1 Pagoda - Muhammad Shah

Emitent Mughal Empire
Rok
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nominał 1 Pagoda
Waluta Rupee (1540-1842)
Skład Gold
Waga 2.7 g
Średnica 12 mm
Grubość
Kształt Round (irregular)
Technika
Orientacja
Rytownik(zy)
W obiegu do
Źródło(a) KM#E440
Opis awersu
Pismo awersu Urdu
Legenda awersu
Opis rewersu
Pismo rewersu Urdu
Legenda rewersu
Krawędź
Mennica
Nakład ND 1153 / XX - Ganjikot Mint; KM#E440.3 -
ND 1168 / X - Guti Mint; KM#E440.2 -
ND 11XX / 1 - Imtiyazgarh Mint; KM#E440.1 -
ND 11XX / 12 - Imtiyazgarh Mint; KM#E440.1 -
ND 11XX / 2 - Imtiyazgarh Mint; KM#E440.1 -
ND 11XX / 3 - Imtiyazgarh Mint; KM#E440.1 -
ND 11XX / 31 - Imtiyazgarh Mint; KM#E440.1 -
ND 11XX / 8 - Imtiyazgarh Mint; KM#E440.1 -
ND ND - Imtiyazgarh Mint; KM#E440.1 -
ID Numisquare 7040882030
Dodatkowe informacje

Historical Context: This 1 Pagoda coin hails from the reign of Muhammad Shah (1719-1748), a period marked by the accelerated decline of the Mughal Empire. Known as "Rangila," his rule saw the rise of powerful regional states and the devastating invasion of Nadir Shah in 1739, which significantly weakened central authority. The issuance of a "Pagoda" type by the Mughal Empire is particularly noteworthy, as this denomination was traditionally prevalent in South India, associated with Hindu kingdoms and later regional powers. Its production by the Mughals, or under their nominal suzerainty in the Deccan, signifies an adaptation to established local monetary systems, often by semi-autonomous governors attempting to integrate into regional commerce while still acknowledging the emperor.

Artistry: The specific engraver for Mughal coins of this era is rarely known, with design execution typically attributed to master die-sinkers within imperial or provincial mints. The stylistic school adheres to the classical Mughal numismatic tradition, characterized by elegant Persian calligraphy. Due to the small flan size (12mm) and gold weight (2.7g), the design of this Pagoda would feature highly condensed and stylized inscriptions. The obverse typically presents the ruler's name and titles, possibly with a regnal year, while the reverse would carry the mint name and a date. The challenge for the die-sinker was to maintain legibility and aesthetic balance within the limited space, often resulting in truncated legends compared to larger Mughal Mohurs.

Technical/Grading: As with many hand-struck coins of the period, technical strike qualities can vary significantly. High-points for this type would generally be the raised portions of the calligraphic elements, particularly the tops of letters and diacritics. Collectors should look for a well-centered strike, which is often a challenge given the manual production process. Weakness in the strike, especially towards the flan edges, is common, potentially obscuring parts of the legend or mint name. The small, thick planchet of a Pagoda can also lead to incomplete detail across the entire surface. A specimen exhibiting full, clear legends and minimal die wear, despite the inherent production limitations, would be considered exceptional.

×