Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Goryeo (918-1392) |
|---|---|
| Năm | 1103 |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | 1 Mun |
| Tiền tệ | Cast Coinage (918-1392) |
| Chất liệu | Bronze |
| Trọng lượng | 2.4 g |
| Đường kính | 23.5 mm |
| Độ dày | 1 mm |
| Hình dạng | Round with a square hole |
| Kỹ thuật | |
| Hướng | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | Hartill#25.72 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | -Top to Bottom: 海東 (Hae Dong) -Right to Left: 重寶 (Chung Bo) |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | Chinese (traditional, regular script) |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước |
ㅤ海 寶ㅤ東 ㅤ重 (Translation: 海 (Hae): Sea 東 (Dong): East 重 (Chung): Heavy or Important 寶 (Bo): Treasure) |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Blank. |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (1103) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4506624480 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: The 1 Mun Hae Dong Chung Bo, issued in 1103, represents a pivotal monetary initiative during Goryeo King Sukjong's reign (1095-1105). Sukjong aimed to modernize the Goryeo economy by establishing a native metallic currency, reducing reliance on barter and imported Chinese coins. This coin, part of the Hae Dong Tong Bo series, was crucial for fostering domestic commerce and asserting economic sovereignty. It stands as a tangible artifact of Goryeo's ambitious economic reforms.
Artistry: The 1 Mun Hae Dong Chung Bo's design reflects Goryeo court calligraphic traditions, influenced by Chinese numismatic aesthetics but with a distinct Korean interpretation. While specific engravers are unknown, the inscription "Hae Dong Chung Bo" (海東重寶) is rendered in robust regular script (kai shu). Characters are arranged clockwise around the central square hole, typical for East Asian cash coins. The artistry, though sometimes less refined than Song dynasty examples, displays clear, purposeful execution characteristic of Goryeo minting.
Technical/Grading: This bronze coin, 2.4 grams and 23.5 millimeters, exhibits typical casting qualities for its era. Key grading points include the sharpness and clarity of individual character strokes and the definition of the inner and outer rims. A premium example shows minimal casting flaws, such as sand pitting or uneven surfaces, and a well-centered square hole. Overall technical quality varies, but strong, legible inscriptions on a relatively smooth planchet indicate careful production despite ancient casting limitations.