Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
1 Karshapana - Kumbha Satarkani
| Issuer | Satavahana Empire |
|---|---|
| Year | 230-250 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Karshapana |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Brahmi |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The reverse displays the characteristic Satavahana-Ujjain symbol, consisting of four large globular orbs arranged symmetrically and interconnected by crossing lines, forming a cruciform pattern at the centre of the field. This device, widely attested on Satavahana and related Deccan coinage, is rendered in high schematic relief. The globes are bold and well-formed relative to the crude flan, occupying most of the reverse field. No inscriptions or additional symbols are present. The execution is consistent with the cast potin technique employed for this series. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Satavahana dynasty issued potin coinage — an alloy of copper, lead, and tin — as a practical response to metal scarcity in the Deccan, where silver deposits were limited and trade still demanded small-denomination exchange. Kumbha Satarkani's precise position within the dynastic sequence remains debated among scholars, complicated by the fragmentary nature of Puranic king lists and the absence of dated inscriptions on most Satavahana issues.
Attribution of individual rulers to specific coin types in this period relies heavily on punch mark analysis and stratigraphic findspot data from sites like Nevasa and Ter.