Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Karshapana - Kumbha Satarkani

Uitgever Satavahana Empire
Jaar 230-250
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Elephant standing to right with trunk raised, rendered in bold relief typical of late Satavahana potin coinage. The body of the elephant is depicted in a schematic, stylised manner with prominent rounded haunches and a curving trunk. A Brahmi legend appears above the elephant in the upper field, reading 'Kumbha', identifying the issuing ruler. The flan is irregularly shaped with a roughly granular surface characteristic of cast potin fabric. The overall design, though struck on a crude flan, retains clear iconographic intent consistent with Satavahana dynastic imagery.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (230-250)
Aanvullende informatie

The Satavahana dynasty issued potin coinage — an alloy of copper, lead, and tin — as a practical response to metal scarcity in the Deccan, where silver deposits were limited and trade still demanded small-denomination exchange. Kumbha Satarkani's precise position within the dynastic sequence remains debated among scholars, complicated by the fragmentary nature of Puranic king lists and the absence of dated inscriptions on most Satavahana issues.

Attribution of individual rulers to specific coin types in this period relies heavily on punch mark analysis and stratigraphic findspot data from sites like Nevasa and Ter.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT