1 Groschen Counterstamped

発行体 Göttingen, City of
年号
種類 Standard circulation coin
額面 1 Groschen (1⁄24)
通貨 Thaler
材質 Silver
重量 2.76 g
直径
厚さ
形状 Round
製造技法
向き
彫刻師
流通終了年
参考文献 Krusy#G 2.30
表面の説明 Crowned G counterstamp.
表面の文字体系
表面の銘文
裏面の説明
裏面の文字体系
裏面の銘文
鋳造所
鋳造数 ND - -
Numisquare ID 1104136100
追加情報

Historical Context: This 1 Groschen counterstamped issue originates from Göttingen, a significant university city within the Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg, later the Electorate of Hanover. Lacking a specific year, the practice of counterstamping Groschen, a common silver denomination, strongly suggests a period of monetary instability or revalidation, most frequently observed in the late 17th or 18th century across the Holy Roman Empire. Göttingen, as a semi-autonomous city, often exercised its right to regulate currency circulation within its domain, using counterstamps to officially sanction older, potentially debased, or foreign coinage for local trade, thereby maintaining economic stability and asserting municipal authority over monetary policy.

Artistry: The original 1 Groschen coin would have exhibited characteristics typical of German Baroque numismatics, featuring the city's arms (often incorporating the Brunswick-Lüneburg lions) and an appropriate inscription. The counterstamp itself, however, is the defining artistic element. These were typically small, often crudely rendered, and applied with varying degrees of force. They usually bore a simplified municipal device, such as the city's monogram (e.g., a "G") or a small shield, serving a purely functional purpose of re-validation rather than aesthetic enhancement. Specific engravers for such issues are rarely documented, with the counterstamp's design being a practical, rather than artistic, decision by the city mint or assay office.

Technical/Grading: For this counterstamped 1 Groschen, grading prioritizes the clarity and completeness of the counterstamp. A premium is placed on a sharply struck, fully visible countermark, showing all intended details, ideally centered over a significant feature of the host coin. The depth of the counterstamp, whether incuse or in relief, is also crucial. Secondary considerations include the preservation of the original coin's design, particularly any date or key legends that remain visible beneath or adjacent to the counterstamp. The overall strike quality of the host coin, its planchet integrity (absence of significant flan flaws or clipping), and general wear on the highest points of both the original design and the counterstamp are critical.

×