Katalog
| Emittent | Hamburg, Free Hanseatic city of |
|---|---|
| Jahr | |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Gold |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | ✠ DnS • FRIDЄRIC' • ЄPC • TRΛIЄCTЄnS |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Latin |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Hamburg applied its countermark to foreign gold guilders circulating in the city as a means of validating their fineness and authorizing continued use — a practice that reflects the chronic shortage of locally struck gold coinage in northern German trading centers during the late medieval period. The Utrecht guilder was among the most widely accepted Rhenish-type coins in the lower Rhine and North Sea trade networks, which made it a logical candidate for official endorsement rather than melting.
Countermarked pieces of this type are rare survivors; most were eventually recoined once Hamburg expanded its own minting output.