See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Duit

Issuer Utrecht, City of
Year 1739-1793
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness 1 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse bears the heraldic arms of the City of Utrecht: a shield divided per bend sinister, charged with a diagonal band of fine parallel lines representing the traditional Utrecht device, surmounted by an elaborate mural or civic crown with cross-tipped finials and orb. Two rampant lions serve as supporters, each facing inward and grasping the sides of the shield with their forelegs. Below the escutcheon, a horizontal line separates the composition from a decorative scrollwork ornament at the base of the field.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Utrecht struck duits continuously across this long span to meet the chronic small-change shortage that plagued the Dutch Republic's internal commerce, particularly in markets and toll transactions where VOC coinage was too valuable to break. The city's municipal issues ran parallel to provincial duits and were legally interchangeable within the Republic, though Utrecht's civic authority over its own copper coinage was effectively a holdover from medieval urban autonomy — one that survived well past the point where it made administrative sense.

Production ended with the collapse of the Republic in 1795, not in 1793 as the span implies for some die marriages.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE