Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Ducat - Ernest of Bavaria
| Uitgever | Glatz |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1549-1554 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | MB#36, Fr#1068 |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | The crowned Bohemian lion rampant to left occupies the central field, rendered in high relief with bold detailing to the mane, claws, and double tail characteristic of the Bohemian heraldic tradition. The figure is enclosed within a beaded inner circle. The surrounding legend, separated from the inner circle by a plain border, records the titles of Ernest of Bavaria in Latin capitals, reading continuously around the coin. The overall die style is consistent with mid-sixteenth-century Central European hammered gold coinage. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Glatz — the fortified county wedged between Bohemia and Silesia — passed to the Habsburgs in 1526 but retained its own coinage rights under appointed governors. Ernest of Bavaria held the county as a pledge rather than outright possession, a financial arrangement typical of mid-sixteenth century Habsburg cash-flow management, and his authority to strike gold in his own name derived from that pledgeholder status rather than any territorial sovereignty.
The five-year window of this issue reflects the duration of the pledge term precisely.