Catalog
| Issuer | Namibia (1990-date) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1990 |
| Type | Coin pattern |
| Value | 1 Dollar |
| Currency | Dollar / Mark (1990: planification phase) |
| Composition | Copper-nickel |
| Weight | 12.0 g |
| Diameter | 31.0 mm |
| Thickness | 2.0 mm |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | Milled |
| Orientation | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | X#E3 |
| Obverse description | Arms with supporters within beaded border above date. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | NAMIBIA VIRIBUS UNITIS 1990 |
| Reverse description | |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | PROBE ESSAI 1 S DOLLAR |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
1990 - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1384971840 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: The 1990 Namibia 1 Dollar trial strike emerges from a pivotal moment in African history: Namibia's declaration of independence from South African administration on March 21, 1990. This coin represents the nascent stages of national sovereignty, as the newly formed government under President Sam Nujoma sought to establish its distinct identity, including a sovereign monetary system. As a trial piece, it signifies the crucial experimental phase in minting the nation's inaugural currency, symbolizing economic autonomy and a definitive break from its colonial past.
Artistry: While specific engraver attribution for this trial strike remains uncredited, the design intent reflects the modern, nationalistic stylistic school prevalent in post-colonial nations. Typical Namibian coinage often features indigenous wildlife and national emblems, aiming to project a unique national identity. One can anticipate the obverse bearing the newly adopted Coat of Arms, symbolizing the state's authority, while the reverse likely showcases an iconic animal, such as the Oryx or Fish Eagle, or the denomination, rendered with clear, recognizable imagery suitable for mass production.
Technical/Grading: Struck in copper-nickel, a durable and aesthetically pleasing alloy, this 31.0 mm, 12.0 g trial piece would have been meticulously examined for strike quality. Key high-points susceptible to wear or weakness on such a design typically include the fine details of any animal's fur or feathers, or the intricate elements of the national coat of arms. A well-struck example would exhibit sharp, full details across the design, clear separation between devices and fields, and a well-defined rim, indicating successful die preparation and striking pressure during trials.