目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | ONE |
| 签名 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 变体 | P#S1041a - Partially engraved date. Red word protector on back P#S1041b - Engraved date, hand signed signature of B. Pomroy at right. Red overprint: STANBRIDGE P#S1041c - As b. Red overprint: STANSTEAD P#S1041d - As b. Red overprint: WATERLOO P#S1041e - Engraved date and printed signature of B. Pomroy at right |
| 备注 |
The Eastern Townships Bank was chartered in 1859 under a Province of Canada statute, making this dollar note a very early issue — quite possibly from the bank's opening year of operation. The British American Bank Note Company, founded in Montreal just two years prior in 1866—
Wait, I need to fact-check that. BABNC was founded in 1866, which conflicts with a 1859 date. Let me reconsider. The British American Bank Note Company was established in 1866. A note dated 1859 and attributed to BABNC presents a chronological problem. Either the reference date reflects the charter or series authorization rather than actual printing, or the printer attribution requires verification. Rather than paper over that contradiction, the honest entry is:The Eastern Townships Bank received its charter in 1859, but the British American Bank Note Company was not established in Montreal until 1866 — which means this note, whatever its series date, could not have been printed before that year. The 1859 reference almost certainly reflects the bank's founding or the legislative authorization for this denomination, not the actual year of issue. That distinction matters when dating the note for collection purposes.