カタログ
全画像を表示 — 無料登録
Googleで続ける — 無料
またはメールで登録
登録が必要な理由は？ボットからカタログを守るためだけです。メールアドレスは非公開で、共有したり許可なくメールを送ることは一切ありません。それをお約束します！
| 表面の説明 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
|---|---|
| 表面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の説明 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の銘文 | ONE |
| 署名 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 偽造防止技術 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 偽造防止の説明 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| バリエーション | P#S1041a - Partially engraved date. Red word protector on back P#S1041b - Engraved date, hand signed signature of B. Pomroy at right. Red overprint: STANBRIDGE P#S1041c - As b. Red overprint: STANSTEAD P#S1041d - As b. Red overprint: WATERLOO P#S1041e - Engraved date and printed signature of B. Pomroy at right |
| コメント |
The Eastern Townships Bank was chartered in 1859 under a Province of Canada statute, making this dollar note a very early issue — quite possibly from the bank's opening year of operation. The British American Bank Note Company, founded in Montreal just two years prior in 1866—
Wait, I need to fact-check that. BABNC was founded in 1866, which conflicts with a 1859 date. Let me reconsider. The British American Bank Note Company was established in 1866. A note dated 1859 and attributed to BABNC presents a chronological problem. Either the reference date reflects the charter or series authorization rather than actual printing, or the printer attribution requires verification. Rather than paper over that contradiction, the honest entry is:The Eastern Townships Bank received its charter in 1859, but the British American Bank Note Company was not established in Montreal until 1866 — which means this note, whatever its series date, could not have been printed before that year. The 1859 reference almost certainly reflects the bank's founding or the legislative authorization for this denomination, not the actual year of issue. That distinction matters when dating the note for collection purposes.