Catalog
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 225-325 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Denarius = 1/25 Aureus |
| Currency | Aureus (circa 150-325) |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | 3.65 g |
| Diameter | 17 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) |
| Obverse description | Draped bust facing right surrounded by legend. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | [...] - CVSTA |
| Reverse description | Person facing left holding caduceus and scepter, all surrounded by legend. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | [...]EIYTO9 - EIIIICTTVR |
| Edge | Smooth. |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (225-325) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 3467470060 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This denarius, an imitation struck by uncertain Germanic tribes (225-325 CE), reflects the profound economic and cultural influence of the Roman Empire. Imitating empresses like Julia Domna (193-211) or Julia Maesa (218-224) suggests their imperial portraits were prominent in Roman coinage circulating along the limes. Such imitations served practical trade, filling a void where tribes lacked sophisticated monetary systems, and acknowledged Roman currency's prestige during the tumultuous Crisis of the Third Century. These issues highlight the complex monetary landscape at the periphery of the declining Roman silver economy.
Artistry: The unknown Germanic engraver operated within a "barbaric imitation" stylistic school, departing from the refined naturalism of official Roman mints. The design, based on a Roman prototype, would likely exhibit simplified facial features, less intricate hair, and a generally flatter, more abstract rendering of the empress's portrait. Reverse details, if present, would similarly be reduced to essential elements, often resulting in a more stylized and less anatomically precise depiction than its imperial model, reflecting a blend of Roman iconography and local artistic interpretation.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 3.65 grams and 17 millimeters, this silver imitation broadly aligns with contemporary Roman denarii weight standards, though actual silver content varied considerably. High-points for grading, such as the hair, nose, and chin of the obverse portrait, are frequently less defined due to cruder dies and less advanced striking techniques. Technical strike qualities often reveal irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and areas of weakness or flatness, reflecting less sophisticated minting practices compared to centralized Roman imperial workshops.