Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | France |
|---|---|
| Year | 1796 |
| Type | Coin pattern |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | COUPÉ ET FRAPPÉ EN MEME TEMS PAR |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
In 1796, the Directory-era Monnaie de Paris was experimenting with alternative striking methods to address chronic shortages of viable coinage metal. The Gengembre process — named for the chemist who developed it — involved treating tin to improve its hardness and surface stability, making it a plausible substitute for copper in small denominations. These centimes never reached circulation; the process was ultimately abandoned as insufficient for production-scale durability.
The variant designation in Mazard reflects genuine die differences among surviving trial pieces, suggesting multiple striking sessions rather than a single proof run.