Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Cent - Washington "Double Head"

Uitgever United States (pre-federal and private territorial)
Jaar 1820
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Dollar
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Latin
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Laureate and draped bust of George Washington facing left, closely mirroring the obverse effigy, with a military uniform and epaulette at the shoulder and a laurel sprig upon his head — giving this piece its characteristic 'double head' designation. A small six-pointed star appears below the bust truncation. The denomination legend ONE CENT arcs along the upper periphery within a beaded border.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The "Double Head" cents of the 1820s were private merchant tokens, not federal issues — struck by entrepreneurs filling a chronic small-change shortage that the U.S. Mint, still operating under significant capacity constraints, consistently failed to address. The Washington obverse dies used on these pieces were recycled and recombined freely, which is precisely why mule varieties like this two-headed piece exist at all. A single die shop could produce numerous die marriages from a shared stock, making provenance tracing genuinely difficult.

The specific PCGS numbers cited here reflect two distinct variety attributions for what appears to be the same nominal type — worth verifying against the Fuld or Rulau references before cataloging further.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT