See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Cent - Washington "Double Head"

Issuer United States (pre-federal and private territorial)
Year 1820
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Dollar
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Laureate and draped bust of George Washington facing left, closely mirroring the obverse effigy, with a military uniform and epaulette at the shoulder and a laurel sprig upon his head — giving this piece its characteristic 'double head' designation. A small six-pointed star appears below the bust truncation. The denomination legend ONE CENT arcs along the upper periphery within a beaded border.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The "Double Head" cents of the 1820s were private merchant tokens, not federal issues — struck by entrepreneurs filling a chronic small-change shortage that the U.S. Mint, still operating under significant capacity constraints, consistently failed to address. The Washington obverse dies used on these pieces were recycled and recombined freely, which is precisely why mule varieties like this two-headed piece exist at all. A single die shop could produce numerous die marriages from a shared stock, making provenance tracing genuinely difficult.

The specific PCGS numbers cited here reflect two distinct variety attributions for what appears to be the same nominal type — worth verifying against the Fuld or Rulau references before cataloging further.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE