目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | Reverse is unprinted, bearing only a repeating watermark pattern across the entire surface of both halves. |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 签名 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪描述 | Repeated small 'OHIO' text watermark pattern covering the entire reverse of both receipt halves. |
| 变体 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 备注 |
Ohio introduced its sales tax in 1934, and the fractional cent problem was immediate: merchants collecting a 3% tax on small purchases had no mechanism to make exact change in tax. Several states briefly experimented with paper tax tokens or receipts to bridge the gap, but most abandoned the approach quickly. Ohio's program was among the more systematically distributed, with the receipts printed locally by Reserve Litho in Cleveland rather than through a federal or national security printer — an unusual choice that reflects the ad hoc, state-administered nature of the whole scheme.
The watermark on a receipt of this size and purpose is a notable detail. For a disposable fiscal instrument worth a single cent, it suggests either a pre-printed security stock or political pressure to discourage counterfeiting at even the smallest denomination.