カタログ
全画像を表示 — 無料登録
Googleで続ける — 無料
またはメールで登録
登録が必要な理由は？ボットからカタログを守るためだけです。メールアドレスは非公開で、共有したり許可なくメールを送ることは一切ありません。それをお約束します！
| 表面の説明 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
|---|---|
| 表面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の説明 | Reverse is unprinted, bearing only a repeating watermark pattern across the entire surface of both halves. |
| 裏面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 署名 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 偽造防止技術 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 偽造防止の説明 | Repeated small 'OHIO' text watermark pattern covering the entire reverse of both receipt halves. |
| バリエーション | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| コメント |
Ohio introduced its sales tax in 1934, and the fractional cent problem was immediate: merchants collecting a 3% tax on small purchases had no mechanism to make exact change in tax. Several states briefly experimented with paper tax tokens or receipts to bridge the gap, but most abandoned the approach quickly. Ohio's program was among the more systematically distributed, with the receipts printed locally by Reserve Litho in Cleveland rather than through a federal or national security printer — an unusual choice that reflects the ad hoc, state-administered nature of the whole scheme.
The watermark on a receipt of this size and purpose is a notable detail. For a disposable fiscal instrument worth a single cent, it suggests either a pre-printed security stock or political pressure to discourage counterfeiting at even the smallest denomination.