Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Chinese kingdoms |
|---|---|
| Year | 927-951 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Cast |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Chinese |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Chinese |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The "Kai Da" cash issues belong to the chaotic interlude known as the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period, when central Tang authority had completely collapsed and dozens of competing regional powers struck their own coinage — often in debased metals — simply to keep local economies functioning. Lead was not an ideological choice; it was a practical one driven by chronic copper shortages and the near-total breakdown of inter-regional metal supply chains.
Attributing these pieces to a specific issuing kingdom remains genuinely contested. Hartill's tentative placement within the minor southern kingdoms reflects documentary gaps rather than settled scholarship.