Catalogus
| Uitgever | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 290-325 |
| Type | Non-circulating coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Crude barbarous imitation of a Roman imperial bust facing right, depicted in a simplified, stylized manner characteristic of Germanic tribal coinage. The effigy shows a draped bust with a rudimentary diadem or radiate crown, rendered with broad, schematic strokes by an engraver unfamiliar with classical Roman die-cutting techniques. Surrounding the bust is a degenerate pseudo-legend composed of vertical strokes imitating Latin letters, arranged in an irregular circular band. The overall execution reflects a deliberate yet artistically naive attempt to replicate a late Roman aureus prototype. The field is plain and slightly uneven, consistent with the irregular flan typical of barbarous imitative struck coinage. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Barbarous gold imitations of Roman aurei circulated widely among Germanic groups during the late third and early fourth centuries, functioning as prestige objects and diplomatic currency rather than everyday exchange media. Roman solidi and aurei entering the frontier zones through military pay, ransoms, and treaty payments were copied locally — often from worn or secondhand prototypes — producing the degraded legends and distorted portraiture that make attribution to any specific imperial prototype nearly impossible in cases like this one.
At 5.18g, this piece sits close to the Diocletianic reformed aureus standard, which may narrow the prototype window.