Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Stolberg, County of |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1546-1552 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Thaler (1470-1706) |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Central device comprising an elaborately mantled and crested tournament helmet surmounted by a large fan-shaped plume crest, rendered in the ornate Renaissance style. The helmet faces left and is adorned with flowing lambrequin mantling that fills the field on either side. A circular Latin legend surrounds the central device, carrying the titles and names of the five co-ruling counts of Stolberg. The overall design reflects the heraldic conventions of mid-sixteenth-century German territorial coinage. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Latin |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Stolberg's mid-sixteenth century fractional thalers are joint-rule coinages, issued under the collective authority of five counts simultaneously — a product of the Ernestine inheritance customs that left German territories perpetually subdivided among male heirs. The five names on this piece reflect a partition arrangement that would have made unified monetary policy nearly impossible, yet the county managed consistent coinage across nearly a decade.
The Schultze reference places this among a small documented series. Surviving examples are scarce in any grade; Stolberg produced no mint of significant scale, and output volumes were modest even by contemporary county standards.