Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 568-690 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1/4 Siliqua = 1⁄96 Solidus |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (568-690) |
| Additional information |
The attribution "uncertain Germanic tribes" reflects a genuine scholarly impasse — these tiny silver fractions circulated across a post-Roman western Europe where mint authority was fragmented, record-keeping had collapsed, and multiple successor kingdoms were simultaneously imitating late Roman monetary forms. The staurogram itself predates Christianity's official adoption by the Roman state, originating as a scribal abbreviation for the Greek word for cross before acquiring theological weight.
At 0.40 g, these pieces were already pushing the lower boundary of practical silver coinage. Prolonged use of underweight fractions like this one contributed directly to the monetary chaos that would eventually force Carolingian reformers to abandon the siliqua system entirely.