Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1/2 Rupee / Deb Period III

Uitgever Bhutan
Jaar 1835-1910
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Rupee (1789-1957)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Central field dominated by an elaborate interlaced endless knot (dpal be'u), a traditional Bhutanese auspicious symbol, rendered in raised relief with bold, flowing lines. The design is divided by a cross-ruled grid pattern into quadrants, with the knot occupying the left portion of the field. The coin's irregular flan and hammered fabric are characteristic of Bhutanese copper coinage of the Deb period.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Bhutan's coinage during this period was produced by hand-striking at small local mints, resulting in enormous variability in flan preparation, die alignment, and alloy consistency — brass and copper pieces from the same "issue" can differ so markedly that attribution by composition alone is unreliable. The long date range reflects continuous restrike practice rather than distinct annual production runs.

KM#15 encompasses multiple die varieties, and the boundaries between Deb periods remain contested among specialists, with attribution often depending on institutional collection history rather than firm documentary evidence.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT