Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Bhutan |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1835-1910 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Rupee (1789-1957) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Central field dominated by an elaborate interlaced endless knot (dpal be'u), a traditional Bhutanese auspicious symbol, rendered in raised relief with bold, flowing lines. The design is divided by a cross-ruled grid pattern into quadrants, with the knot occupying the left portion of the field. The coin's irregular flan and hammered fabric are characteristic of Bhutanese copper coinage of the Deb period. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Bhutan's coinage during this period was produced by hand-striking at small local mints, resulting in enormous variability in flan preparation, die alignment, and alloy consistency — brass and copper pieces from the same "issue" can differ so markedly that attribution by composition alone is unreliable. The long date range reflects continuous restrike practice rather than distinct annual production runs.
KM#15 encompasses multiple die varieties, and the boundaries between Deb periods remain contested among specialists, with attribution often depending on institutional collection history rather than firm documentary evidence.