| صادرکننده | East Anglia, Kingdom of |
|---|---|
| سال | 880-910 |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | 1/2 Penny (1⁄480) |
| واحد پول | Pound |
| ترکیب | Silver |
| وزن | 0.55 g |
| قطر | |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | Sp#970, North#475.9 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Small cross pattée within inner circle, legend around. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | Latin |
| نوشتههای روی سکه |
EL FR ED RE (Translation: King Alfred.) |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Two line inscription, pellet above and below. |
| خط پشت سکه | Latin |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه |
DIARVALD MO (Translation: Diarvald, moneyer.) |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (880-910) - - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 1719834470 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This 1/2 Penny Viking imitation from East Anglia, issued 880-910, encapsulates the complex monetary landscape of the late 9th and early 10th centuries. Struck within the Danelaw, it reflects the pragmatic approach of Viking settlers who, despite their rivalry with Alfred the Great, adopted his coinage for local commerce. These imitations signify the economic integration and recognition of established currency forms by new powers, demonstrating the pervasive influence of Alfred's successful monetary system even beyond his direct control.
Artistry: The artistry of this Viking imitation coin, produced by anonymous East Anglian artisans, markedly differs from genuine Anglo-Saxon issues. The stylistic school is distinctly imitative, characterized by simplified designs, crude renderings of portraits or monograms, and often blundered or illiterate legends. While intended to evoke Alfred's coinage, the execution reflects a pragmatic rather than aesthetic focus, prioritizing recognizable form over precise detail, a hallmark of these unofficial issues.
Technical/Grading: Technically, these Viking imitations are often defined by their irregular fabric and strike quality. This 0.55 gram 1/2 Penny exemplifies the type's inherent crudeness. High-points, such as the central motif or legend elements, frequently show weakness due to worn dies or insufficient striking pressure. Irregular flan shapes and off-centring are common. Grading would consider the clarity of the central design and the degree of legend legibility, always accounting for the expected technical limitations of these unofficial issues.