カタログ
全画像を表示 — 無料登録
Googleで続ける — 無料
またはメールで登録
登録が必要な理由は？ボットからカタログを守るためだけです。メールアドレスは非公開で、共有したり許可なくメールを送ることは一切ありません。それをお約束します！
| 表面の説明 | Plain field bearing three lines of incuse Latin legend arranged concentrically across the coin's face: JAMES NOKES arching along the upper periphery, GROCER in large characters across the centre, and MELBOURNE arching along the lower periphery. The entire design is enclosed within a toothed or dentilated border running the full circumference of the coin, consistent with W.J. Taylor's tradesman token production style. No figurative device or pictorial element is present; the design relies entirely on the bold typographic legend for its decorative effect. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 表面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の説明 | A seated female allegorical figure, rendered in the manner of Britannia, occupies the central field, depicted in profile facing left and resting upon a rock or plinth with a shield at her side. The legend AUSTRALIA arches along the upper periphery in bold Latin capitals. The design, engraved by W.J. Taylor of Birmingham, draws upon the established British tradesman token tradition, adapting the familiar Britannia motif to an Australian colonial context. The rim is plain, without dentilation, offering a contrast to the obverse treatment. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 裏面の銘文 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 縁 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 鋳造所 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 鋳造数 | ログイン して詳細を見る |
| 追加情報 |
James Nokes operated a grocery business in Melbourne during the acute small-change shortage that plagued the Australian colonies in the 1850s and 1860s, when official copper coinage from Britain arrived too slowly and in quantities wholly inadequate for a population exploding under gold rush conditions. Colonial traders routinely commissioned their own tokens from British die-sinkers — primarily Heaton's of Birmingham — which then circulated as functional currency among regular customers and beyond. Nokes was one of dozens of Melbourne tradespeople who took this route.
The Andrews, Roper, and Gray references cataloguing this piece reflect the overlapping 20th-century efforts to systematically document Australian colonial tokens, a field where attribution disputes remain unresolved for several issues in this series.