Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1/2 Groschen - Unknown voivode

Uitgever Moldavia
Jaar 1432-1457
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde A heraldic shield occupies the central field, bearing a cross in the middle register with a star positioned beneath it. A second cross appears above, and the letter 'S' is placed to the left. A horizontal bar is visible in the lower-left portion of the shield. The design is characteristic of Moldavian hammered coinage of the mid-fifteenth century, with irregular flan and variable relief.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (1432-1457)
Aanvullende informatie

Moldavia's mid-15th century coinage remains one of the least-documented series in Eastern European numismatics, with many issues still unattributed to specific voivodes despite decades of specialist study. The reign bracket here spans a period of considerable dynastic turbulence — between 1432 and 1457, Moldavia cycled through multiple rulers, several of whom met violent ends in succession conflicts with rival claimants backed variously by Poland and Hungary. That instability is precisely why attribution fails: die-link studies are hampered by small surviving populations and inconsistent documentary records from Suceava.

MBR#603d places this piece within a recognized typological grouping without resolving the issuer question.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT