Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
1/2 Groschen - Unknown voivode
| Issuer | Moldavia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1432-1457 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | A heraldic shield occupies the central field, bearing a cross in the middle register with a star positioned beneath it. A second cross appears above, and the letter 'S' is placed to the left. A horizontal bar is visible in the lower-left portion of the shield. The design is characteristic of Moldavian hammered coinage of the mid-fifteenth century, with irregular flan and variable relief. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1432-1457) |
| Additional information |
Moldavia's mid-15th century coinage remains one of the least-documented series in Eastern European numismatics, with many issues still unattributed to specific voivodes despite decades of specialist study. The reign bracket here spans a period of considerable dynastic turbulence — between 1432 and 1457, Moldavia cycled through multiple rulers, several of whom met violent ends in succession conflicts with rival claimants backed variously by Poland and Hungary. That instability is precisely why attribution fails: die-link studies are hampered by small surviving populations and inconsistent documentary records from Suceava.
MBR#603d places this piece within a recognized typological grouping without resolving the issuer question.