Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

1.000 Rupiah

Uitgever Negara Republik Indonesia, Membang Moeda, Sumatra
Jaar 1947
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Rupiah (1946-date)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Rudimentary emergency issue printed in red-brown ink on plain paper, with the central denomination numeral '1000 Roepiah' set within a decorative cartouche of crude guilloche-style scrollwork. The inscription 'NEGARA REP. INDONESIA' arches across the upper centre, flanked by corner numeral panels reading '1000'; the legend 'BON' appears at the top and 'NRI' at both top and bottom margins. Below the central vignette, hand-stamped or typeset text reads 'BANK KEDAERAH.' at lower left, 'M. MOEDA' at centre, '10 DEC. 1947' as the issue date, and 'WEDANA K/LEILONG' at lower right.
Opschrift voorzijde NRI
BON
NEGARA REP. INDONESIA
1000 Roepiah
BANK KEDAERAH.
M. MOEDA
10 DEC. 1947
WEDANA K/LEILONG
1000
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

The Membang Moeda issues from Sumatra in 1947 were emergency regional notes, authorized by the Indonesian Republican government during the Dutch military campaign to reclaim the archipelago. With the Dutch naval blockade severely disrupting communications and supply lines between Java and the outer islands, Sumatra's Republican administration was forced to produce its own currency locally rather than rely on centrally printed notes from Yogyakarta.

Handstamp authentication was the only available control mechanism under those conditions — not a design choice, a logistical one. The handstamp varies enough between surviving examples that forgery detection was genuinely difficult at the time.