Katalog
| İhraççı | Vibo Valentia |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 193 BC - 150 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Uncia (1⁄12) |
| Para birimi | As |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 1.13 g |
| Çap | 10 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | HN Italy#2267 , Weber#1071 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Head of Diana right. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Dog right. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Latin |
| Arka yüz lejandı | VALENTIA |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (193 BC - 150 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 2414370750 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: The Uncia from Vibo Valentia, 193-150 BC, originates from a pivotal era in Southern Italy post-Second Punic War. Vibo Valentia, established as a Roman colony in 192 BC, exemplifies Rome's consolidation in Magna Graecia. Issuing coinage on the Roman Uncial standard, even with local characteristics, signifies the gradual economic integration of former Greek territories into the Roman Republic. This coin reflects the administrative and commercial needs of a new Roman colony, bridging Hellenistic autonomy and Republican oversight, providing small change.
Artistry: Lacking a known engraver, this Uncia’s artistry embodies the pragmatic style typical of colonial bronze issues from Magna Graecia. The stylistic school draws from Hellenistic traditions, adapted for a smaller, utilitarian module. The obverse likely features a simplified, perhaps laureate, head of a deity such as Apollo, rendered with local interpretation. The reverse typically bears an elemental design, like a star or crescent, often accompanied by a single pellet signifying its Uncial value. These designs identified the coin's origin and denomination.
Technical/Grading: This diminutive bronze Uncia, at 1.13 grams and 10 millimeters, presents inherent challenges for consistent striking. Typical high-points on the obverse, such as hair and facial features, are frequently found weakly struck or flattened due to the small flan and uneven pressure. The simpler reverse design may show better definition, though off-center strikes are common. The fabric is generally irregular, often exhibiting minor flan cracks or rough edges. Well-centered examples with clear rendering of both obverse and reverse details are desirable for their rarity.