Catalog
| Issuer | Skotoussa |
|---|---|
| Year | 220 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Trihemiobol (1/4) |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | 1.07 g |
| Diameter | 12.0 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | BCD Thessaly II#756 var. |
| Obverse description | Head of youthful Herakles facing right, with a lion skin tied around his neck |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Hekate standing and facing left, holding a long torch in right hand, and placing left hand on hip |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | ΣΚΟΤΟΥΣ ΑΙΩΝ |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (-220) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 7291994000 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Trihemiobol was issued by the Thessalian city of Skotoussa around 220 BC, a turbulent period in Hellenistic Greece. Thessaly was a strategic battleground between the Antigonid Kingdom of Macedon and the Aetolian League. The issuance of this silver denomination underscores Skotoussa's economic autonomy and its role in local commerce, reflecting the city's need for a functional currency for daily transactions and trade amidst larger geopolitical struggles for regional control.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, this coin exemplifies the Late Hellenistic stylistic tradition, blending classical idealism with emerging realism. The obverse likely features a finely rendered head of a local nymph or deity, perhaps Artemis, presented with naturalism. The reverse typically displays an animal symbol strongly associated with Thessaly, such as a horse or bull, executed with vigor, conveying the region's famed equestrian heritage or agricultural wealth, reflecting common civic iconography.
Technical/Grading: Struck from silver, this Trihemiobol measures 12.0 mm and weighs 1.07 grams, consistent with its denomination. High-points for wear on the obverse would typically be the hair and facial features, while on the reverse, the animal's musculature. Numismatically, strike quality for such small issues can vary; examples often exhibit minor off-centering or slight weakness in the strike, particularly towards the flan edges. A well-centered strike with full details on both sides would be considered exceptional.