Catalog
| Issuer | Arcadian League |
|---|---|
| Year | 330 BC - 275 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Trichalkon = 3 Chalkoi = 3⁄48 Drachm (1⁄16) |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 4.01 g |
| Diameter | 17.0 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | BCD Peloponnesos#1532, SNG Copenhagen#202 |
| Obverse description | Horned head of Pan facing right |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | League monogram above syrinx and letter Δ to the left |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (330 BC - 275 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 7278561500 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Trichalkon, issued by Megalopolis within the Arcadian League (330-275 BC), marks a pivotal era. Founded by Thebes in 371 BC as a bulwark against Sparta, Megalopolis maintained significant political and economic standing through the late Classical and early Hellenistic periods. Amidst the tumultuous aftermath of Alexander's conquests and the rise of the Diadochi, the Arcadian League navigated complex power shifts. This bronze denomination served as essential local currency, reflecting Megalopolis's enduring self-governance and economic agency.
Artistry: The engraver of this Trichalkon remains anonymous, yet its design adheres to the late Classical and early Hellenistic Greek stylistic school. Coinage from this period typically exhibits naturalism and idealized forms, often depicting local deities or mythological figures with dignified realism. While specific iconographic details are not provided, Megalopolis coinage commonly featured prominent Arcadian cult figures like Zeus Lykaios or Pan. The artistry aimed for clarity and recognition, reflecting the city's cultural identity through its numismatic representations.
Technical/Grading: This bronze Trichalkon measures 17.0 mm and weighs 4.01 grams. Common for bronze issues of this period, flan quality can vary, often exhibiting minor irregularities in shape or thickness due to casting methods. Strike quality, while generally robust for utilitarian coinage, might show variability in pressure, leading to softer details on the highest points of the design. Collectors assess for central striking, die wear, and preservation of crucial design elements, key indicators of overall technical quality and aesthetic appeal for these ancient bronze pieces.