Trichalkon Megalopolis

İhraççı Arcadian League
Yıl 330 BC - 275 BC
Tür Standard circulation coin
Değer 1 Trichalkon = 3 Chalkoi = 3⁄48 Drachm (1⁄16)
Para birimi Drachm
Bileşim Bronze
Ağırlık 4.01 g
Çap 17.0 mm
Kalınlık
Şekil Round (irregular)
Teknik Hammered
Yönlendirme
Gravürcü(ler)
Dolaşımda olduğu yıl
Referans(lar) BCD Peloponnesos#1532, SNG Copenhagen#202
Ön yüz açıklaması Horned head of Pan facing right
Ön yüz yazısı
Ön yüz lejandı
Arka yüz açıklaması League monogram above syrinx and letter Δ to the left
Arka yüz yazısı Greek
Arka yüz lejandı
Kenar
Darphane
Basma adedi ND (330 BC - 275 BC) - -
Numisquare Kimliği 7278561500
Ek bilgiler

Historical Context: This Trichalkon, issued by Megalopolis within the Arcadian League (330-275 BC), marks a pivotal era. Founded by Thebes in 371 BC as a bulwark against Sparta, Megalopolis maintained significant political and economic standing through the late Classical and early Hellenistic periods. Amidst the tumultuous aftermath of Alexander's conquests and the rise of the Diadochi, the Arcadian League navigated complex power shifts. This bronze denomination served as essential local currency, reflecting Megalopolis's enduring self-governance and economic agency.

Artistry: The engraver of this Trichalkon remains anonymous, yet its design adheres to the late Classical and early Hellenistic Greek stylistic school. Coinage from this period typically exhibits naturalism and idealized forms, often depicting local deities or mythological figures with dignified realism. While specific iconographic details are not provided, Megalopolis coinage commonly featured prominent Arcadian cult figures like Zeus Lykaios or Pan. The artistry aimed for clarity and recognition, reflecting the city's cultural identity through its numismatic representations.

Technical/Grading: This bronze Trichalkon measures 17.0 mm and weighs 4.01 grams. Common for bronze issues of this period, flan quality can vary, often exhibiting minor irregularities in shape or thickness due to casting methods. Strike quality, while generally robust for utilitarian coinage, might show variability in pressure, leading to softer details on the highest points of the design. Collectors assess for central striking, die wear, and preservation of crucial design elements, key indicators of overall technical quality and aesthetic appeal for these ancient bronze pieces.

×