Trichalkon

İhraççı Tegea (Arkadia)
Yıl 230 BC - 170 BC
Tür Standard circulation coin
Değer 1 Trichalkon = 3 Chalkoi = 1⁄16 Drachm
Para birimi Drachm
Bileşim Bronze
Ağırlık 4.41 g
Çap 17 mm
Kalınlık
Şekil Round (irregular)
Teknik Hammered
Yönlendirme Variable alignment ↺
Gravürcü(ler)
Dolaşımda olduğu yıl
Referans(lar) Peloponnesos#1740 , BMC Greek#17-19 , HGC 5#1066
Ön yüz açıklaması Wreathed head of Eileithuia to left, with lit torch over shoulder.
Ön yüz yazısı
Ön yüz lejandı
Arka yüz açıklaması Athena standing right, presenting head of Medusa to Sterope standing left.
Arka yüz yazısı Greek
Arka yüz lejandı ΤΕΓΕΑ
Kenar
Darphane
Basma adedi ND (230 BC - 170 BC) - -
Numisquare Kimliği 6236392850
Ek bilgiler

Historical Context: The Trichalkon, issued by Tegea in Arkadia between 230 BC and 170 BC, dates to the dynamic Hellenistic period. Tegea, a significant Peloponnesian city, navigated complex political landscapes, often aligning with or opposing powerful leagues like the Achaean. The coin’s issuance reflects the city’s civic autonomy and its need for localized bronze currency to facilitate daily commerce within its sphere of influence, underscoring its economic vitality amidst regional flux, rather than being tied to a single ruler.

Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for bronze issues of this period, the Trichalkon adheres to the broader Hellenistic stylistic school. Designs likely featured prominent local deities or civic symbols, such as the head of Athena Alea, Tegea’s revered patron goddess, on the obverse, and possibly a civic emblem on the reverse. The artistry, while often less refined than contemporary silver issues, aimed for recognizable portrayal, blending classical Greek conventions with the evolving realism characteristic of the Hellenistic age.

Technical/Grading: This bronze Trichalkon, weighing 4.41 grams and measuring 17 millimeters, presents typical grading challenges. High-points for wear generally include the hair and facial features on the obverse, and any raised elements of the reverse device. A well-struck example would exhibit full details, particularly in drapery and facial contours, with minimal planchet flaws or off-centering. However, weak strikes, porous surfaces, and minor flan imperfections are common, making pieces with strong relief and good centering highly desirable.

×