Catalog
| Issuer | Maurelius |
|---|---|
| Year | 585-620 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Tremissis (⅓) |
| Currency | Tremissis (476-670) |
| Composition | Gold |
| Weight | 1.26 g |
| Diameter | 13 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | Belfort#cf. 2327, Prou Mer#– |
| Obverse description | Diademed bust facing right. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering |
LVGDV⛬NOCX (Translation: Lyon.) |
| Reverse description | Cross in a beaded circle, legend around. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering |
✠ MΛVRELIVS M (Translation: Moneyer Maurelius.) |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (585-620) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 6034129960 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Tremissis, issued by moneyer Maurelius from the Lyon mint (585-620), reveals the decentralized monetary system of Merovingian Francia. Royal authority was often nominal; local moneyers like Maurelius exercised significant autonomy. Lyon remained a prominent minting center, reflecting regional economic vitality. The moneyer's name as primary issuer, rather than a monarch, highlights the fragmentation of central power and localized economic governance typical of the early medieval era.
Artistry: The coin's design, overseen by Maurelius, exemplifies the distinctive Merovingian stylistic school. Engravers typically rendered a highly stylized, almost abstract bust on the obverse, often a debased imitation of late Roman or Byzantine imperial portraits. The reverse commonly features a Christian cross, sometimes with geometric patterns. This execution departs from classical naturalism, favoring linear and symbolic representation. Such early medieval numismatic art prioritizes legibility and basic symbolism over detailed figural representation.
Technical/Grading: Struck in gold, this Tremissis weighs 1.26 grams and measures 13 millimeters, typical for the denomination. Merovingian issues frequently exhibit technical imperfections: irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and weak impressions due to less sophisticated minting techniques. High points on the obverse include the hair/diadem and prominent bust features. On the reverse, central cross elements are most susceptible to wear or weakness. A well-preserved example would show a relatively full strike despite common flan irregularities.