Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Frankish Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 570-580 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | 1.47 g |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Highly stylized, schematized bust facing right occupying the central field, rendered in the debased Merovingian manner with a prominent crown or diadem above. A star device appears in the field before the bust. The surrounding legend reads CHILPERICΛS, referencing the Frankish king Chilperic I, with the letters distributed around the periphery in a retrograde or irregular arrangement typical of Merovingian workshop practice. The overall design reflects the progressive barbarization of Late Antique imperial coin types under early Frankish coinage. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | CHILPERICΛS (Translation: Chilperic.) |
| Reversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Chilperic I, king of Neustria, was described by Bishop Gregory of Tours as "the Nero and Herod of our time" — a ruler more interested in tax extraction and theological argument than stable governance. His reign saw aggressive manipulation of the gold coinage, and contemporary sources specifically accuse him of debasing the tremissis by substituting inferior metal, an act that provoked direct complaints from his own subjects. Whether a given surviving piece reflects genuine fineness or that documented adulteration is rarely answerable without assay.
The Vermand attribution rests on workshop identification rather than any explicit mint signature — Merovingian tremisses of this period name moneyers, not mints.