Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Trachy - Petar IV / Ivan I Asen Imitating billon aspron trachy of Isaac II Angelus

Uitgever Second Bulgarian Empire
Jaar 1185-1207
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Trachy
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde The Theotokos (Mother of God) enthroned facing, depicted in a frontal, hieratic pose characteristic of Byzantine iconographic tradition. The Virgin is shown nimbate, clad in maphorion, with hands raised in an orant or holding gesture. Abbreviated Greek inscription MP ΘV (Meter Theou) appears in the fields to either side of the figure. The relief is bold but somewhat crude in execution, consistent with Bulgarian imitative coinage of the late 12th to early 13th century.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde MP ΘV
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The Second Bulgarian Empire declared its independence from Byzantium in 1185 following the revolt of brothers Petar and Asen, and the trachea they struck almost immediately imitated Byzantine prototypes — Isaac II Angelus being the reigning emperor at the moment of that rebellion. Copying his coinage was a deliberate political statement: Bulgaria could produce imperial-format currency, yet the execution drifts markedly from Byzantine workshop standards, with irregular flans and inconsistent billon alloy that betray provincial manufacture.

Attributing these imitative pieces precisely to Petar IV or Ivan I Asen individually remains contested, which is why the joint reign attribution persists in most catalogs.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT