| Emittent | Mainz, City of |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1689 |
| Typ | Emergency coin |
| Nennwert | ⅙ Thaler |
| Währung | Thaler |
| Material | Silver |
| Gewicht | 3.82 g |
| Durchmesser | |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round |
| Prägetechnik | |
| Ausrichtung | |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | KM#191 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Crowned ornamented oval, four intertwined cursive L`s (for Louis XIV) with legend |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | MONETA NOVA ARGENTEA |
| Reversbeschreibung | Denomination at center with legend and date surrounding. |
| Reversschrift | |
| Reverslegende | 1/6 GLORIA IN EXCELSIS DEO 1689 |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
1689 - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 1272939980 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: The ⅙ Thaler from Mainz, 1689, is a poignant numismatic artifact from the Nine Years' War (1688-1697), specifically the protracted Siege of Mainz. French forces under Marshal Boufflers besieged the city, then an important Archbishopric and Electorate of the Holy Roman Empire. Imperial forces, led by Charles V, Duke of Lorraine, defended it. This emergency coinage was struck under duress to sustain the city's economy and pay defenders, underscoring the era's geopolitical turmoil and Mainz's strategic importance.
Artistry: As emergency siege coinage, the ⅙ Thaler's artistry prioritizes pragmatic utility over elaborate aesthetics. The engraver, likely an anonymous local artisan, focused on functional design. Stylistically, the coin reflects immediate needs, typically featuring essential elements like the city's coat of arms—the Wheel of Mainz—and clear denominational and date inscriptions. Its design serves as a stark testament to wartime production exigencies, prioritizing legibility and swift execution over artistic flourish.
Technical/Grading: This 3.82-gram silver ⅙ Thaler often exhibits characteristics typical of emergency issues. High-points susceptible to wear or strike weakness include the spokes of the Mainz Wheel and the raised lettering. Strikes are frequently inconsistent, showing varying impressiveness across the flan. Irregular planchets, minor off-centering, and evidence of hastily prepared dies, such as faint cracks, are common. Collectors should prioritize examples with clear legends and discernible central motifs, as even well-preserved pieces may display inherent production flaws from their wartime origins.